Controversial scientist claims pesticide toxicity 'proof'
Jan 30, 2014
http://phys.org/news/2014-01-controversial-scientist-pesticide-toxicity-proof.html#jCp
French professor Gilles-Eric Seralini gives a press conference on November 28, 2013 at EU headquarters in Brussels
Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2014-01-controversial-scientist-pesticide-toxicity-proof.html#jCp
Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2014-01-controversial-scientist-pesticide-toxicity-proof.html#jCp
A controversial French biologist, whose 2012 paper on the alleged dangers of
pesticides was withdrawn, has published new claims that the chemicals were many
times more toxic than advertised.
Gilles-Eric Seralini's earlier work found that rats exposed to genetically
modified maize and the pesticide Roundup developed tumours and other health
problems, but his findings were questioned and his paper in the journal Food
and Chemical Toxicology finally retracted after his study methods were found
lacking.
He told AFP on Thursday that
follow-up tests, this time using human cells, showed that Roundup and other
pesticides that can be bought over the counter were "between two and 1,000
times more toxic than their main, active ingredient".
This was problematic, said Seralini, as the toxicity of the active
ingredient is what determines product guidelines for accepted exposure levels
to the pesticide being used.
"There has been a
miscalculation of the real toxicity of pesticides," the professor said,
claiming his research showed "cells begin to commit suicide" in petri
dish experiments after exposure to the chemicals.
Seralini's earlier paper was quashed
after it prompted probes of pesticide safety by several national health
agencies as well as the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA).
The new study was published in the
journal Biomed Research International, co-signed by two of Seralini's
colleagues at the University of Caen in France.
It tested three herbicides (Roundup,
Matin El and Starane 200), three insecticides (Pirimor G, Confidor and Polysect
Ultra), and three fungicides (Maronee, Opus and Eyetak).
Of the nine, eight "were
several hundred times more toxic than their active principle," the study
said—and pointed to other "confidential" additions to the pesticide
recipe.
Neither Roundup manufacturer
Monsanto nor the EFSA could be reached for comment on Thursday.
The findings were welcomed by the
French NGO Generations Futures (Future Generations), which demanded full
disclosure of all the ingredients of pesticides.
This was problematic, said Seralini, as the toxicity of the active ingredient is what determines product guidelines for accepted exposure levels to the pesticide being used.
A controversial French
biologist, whose 2012 paper on the alleged dangers of pesticides was
withdrawn, has published new claims that the chemicals were many times
more toxic than advertised.
Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2014-01-controversial-scientist-pesticide-toxicity-proof.html#jCp
Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2014-01-controversial-scientist-pesticide-toxicity-proof.html#jCp
French professor Gilles-Eric Seralini gives a press conference on November 28, 2013 at EU headquarters in Brussels
Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2014-01-controversial-scientist-pesticide-toxicity-proof.html#jCp
Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2014-01-controversial-scientist-pesticide-toxicity-proof.html#jCp





0 comments:
Post a Comment