Wheat has taken quite a beating in recent years, being blamed for all
sorts of diseases and illnesses. The rise of gluten intolerant
conditions like Celiac disease has led to an increase in negative
attitudes towards wheat. Gluten is the protein in wheat that is
difficult to digest in so many people. Some have gone so far as to
propose that wheat was never meant to be part of the food chain, and it
is treated as if it is a form of poison.
However, there are
always several factors to consider when looking at gluten sensitivity.
First, as we have pointed out in other places, it is always dangerous to
classify a food group as a static entity, such as a mineral in the
periodic table of elements. Food is alive, and not static. There are
multiple varieties and cultivars, as well as multiple growing conditions
that make it nearly impossible to simply make sweeping generalizations
about any agricultural product, including wheat. Any statement starting
out as “Wheat is” or “Wheat does” risks making the statement almost
meaningless without further defining what kind of wheat, and in what
form.
There are probably few foods so controversial today
as wheat. Yet most people’s experience with wheat as a food is in highly
processed industrial food products. There is increased interest in
recent times in ancient grains, the precursors to modern wheat. While
wheat does not yet exist in the market place as a genetically modified
product, it has been hybridized quite extensively over its long history
to produce the common varieties we have now in the food system. There
are some studies showing that some of these ancient grains are more
easily digested and tolerated by those with gluten sensitivities.
The other factor that gets almost no attention when discussing the
negative effects of modern wheat, is the fact that it could possibly be
an innocent bystander, rather than a causative factor in sensitivities
that result in poor digestion. For one thing, gluten is not the only
protein Americans are having problems digesting. Similar problems exist
with casein (from dairy) and other proteins.
Not only has
wheat changed over the years into the modern era, so too has our
digestive system. There are many culprits in destroying our digestive
systems from being able to digest complex proteins, including our record
levels of consuming pharmaceutical products. There is research showing
that probiotics can reduce or eliminate gluten sensitivity, lending
evidence that this is primarily a digestive issue. (See: Probiotics
Prevent Gluten Sensitivity and Intestinal Damage from Gliadin)
The blame-game attacks against an entire food group, in this case
wheat, reminds me a lot of the attacks against dietary cholesterol in
the 1970s, when cholesterol was classified as something slightly less
than poison. As it turns out, cholesterol has simply been wrongly
convicted as an innocent bystander, as cholesterol is essential to life.
So we come to the most recent research published by Dr.
Stephanie Seneff. Her research is not new here at Health Impact News.
Dr. Seneff was one of the first to link statin drug use and artificially
lowering cholesterol levels with Alzheimer’s Disease back in 2011.
(See: The Clue to Why Low Fat Diet and Statins may Cause Alzheimer’s)
She is a controversial scientist with three degrees from MIT who is not
constrained by Big Pharma funding.
In her most recent
research published in a peer-reviewed journal along with Anthony Samsel,
she looks at the role of glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup,
which is the most popular herbicide used worldwide, and its toxic effect
in destroying our digestive system. Here is another piece of the
problem when looking at gluten sensitivities. In a recent interview she
was asked about glyphosate’s role in Celiac disease and gluten
sensitivities, and this was her reply:
Gluten sensitivity
by itself doesn’t necessarily have the transglutaminase immunogenicity
of Celiac. It shares the same features with Celiac disease, but it’s not
as extreme. But these things also have a host of other pathologies that
are associated with this particular condition of gluten sensitivity,
which is what’s so fascinating to me. All of these risk factors that
co-occur with Celiac disease could be explained through other ways that
glyphosate disrupts physiology. That’s the most fascinating thing to me,
is that you can explain all of these other things, maybe not directly
through the effect of gluten but through the effect of glyphosate on the
body.
People who have Celiac disease have increased risk
for other things; for example, non-hodgkins lymphoma, and they die
earlier because of these other risks. They also have fertility problems,
they are more likely to produce children with birth defects, and are
more likely to have depression and serotonin problems. All of these
things that are connected to Celiac disease, but also exist
independently from Celiac disease, are also caused, in our opinion, by
glyphosate. (Source)
Read the full study online free here.
Here is the Conclusion of the study:
This paper presents an exhaustive review of the toxic effects of the
herbicide, glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup®, in humans, and
demonstrates how glyphosate’s adverse effects on the gut microbiota, in
conjunction with its established ability to inhibit the activity of
cytochrome P450 enzymes, and its likely impairment of sulfate transport,
can remarkably explain a great number of the diseases and conditions
that are prevalent in the modern industrialized world. Its effects are
insidious, because the long-term effects are often not immediately
apparent. The pathologies to which glyphosate could plausibly
contribute, through its known biosemiotic effects, include inflammatory
bowel disease, obesity, depression, ADHD, autism, Alzheimer’s disease,
Parkinson’s disease, ALS, multiple sclerosis, cancer, cachexia,
infertility, and developmental malformations. Glyphosate works
synergistically with other factors, such as insufficient sun exposure,
dietary deficiencies in critical nutrients such as sulfur and zinc, and
synergistic exposure to other xenobiotics whose detoxification is
impaired by glyphosate.
Given the known toxic effects of
glyphosate reviewed here and the plausibility that they are negatively
impacting health worldwide, it is imperative for more independent
research to take place to validate the ideas presented here, and to take
immediate action, if they are verified, to drastically curtail the use
of glyphosate in agriculture. Glyphosate is likely to be pervasive in
our food supply, and, contrary to being essentially nontoxic, it may in
fact be the most biologically disruptive chemical in our environment.
Source:
Glyphosate’s
Suppression of Cytochrome P450 Enzymes and Amino Acid Biosynthesis by
the Gut Microbiome: Pathways to Modern Diseases
Anthony Samsel and Stephanie Seneff – Entropy 2013, 15, 1416-1463
See Also:
Glyphosate, pathways to modern diseases II: Celiac sprue and gluten intolerance
Anthony Samsel and Stephanie Seneff - Interdiscip Toxicol. 2013; Vol. 6 (4): 159–184.
LINK to Article: http://healthimpactnews.com/2014/common-weedkiller-used-in-modern-agriculture-could-be-main-factor-in-gluten-intolerance/
Wednesday, April 16, 2014
Common Weedkiller Used in Modern Agriculture Could be Main Factor in Gluten Intolerance
Labels:
Gluten Intolerance,
glyphosate
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment