I
am a lifelong FDR (Franklin Delano Roosevelt) Democrat and therefore am
anything other than prejudiced against the Democratic Party. But, that
Party died when Bill Clinton became President and undid FDR’s
regulations on the megabanks and FDR’s AFDC income program for children
in poor families, and when Clinton replaced that with restoration of
Wall Street’s control over America (like before FDR, only a more convoluted form of it).
However,
the way in which both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton endanger all
people’s lives and property and health and welfare, has to do with
something else, something that’s even more evil than what Bill Clinton
did, and it’s the Obama-Clinton (that’s Secretary of State and now
Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton) foreign policy, to
overthrow the leaders of nations who are allied with or supportive of
Russia — such as most recently Syria’s Bashar al-Assad, but before that Ukraine’s Viktor Yanukovych, and before that Libya’s Muammar Gaddafi. It’s no mere coincidence that all three had had cordial relations with Russia.
George W. Bush’s 2003 overthrow of yet another
pro-Russian head-of-state, Saddam Hussein, had already done enormous
damage not only to Iraq but to the U.S., and yet Obama and Clinton are
at least as determined to surround Russia by enemies, as Bush was; and
they now even support the installation, on-and-near Russia’s very
borders, of a ‘Ballistic Missile Defense’ system that’s designed to
disable Russia’s ability to retaliate against a U.S. surprise nuclear
attack on Russia — the BMD is astoundingly aggressive, especially
considering that whereas in 1991 the Soviet and then Russian leader
Mikhail Gorbachev terminated both the Soviet Union and the Warsaw Pact on the basis of an understanding from George Herbert Walker Bush and his agents, that NATO would not move “one inch to the east”,
this crucial promise from the U.S. government was violated by Bill
Clinton’s extending NATO into the Czech Republic, Hungary, and Poland;
and by Bush’s son Bush then extending NATO into Bulgaria, Estonia,
Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Slovakia, and Slovenia; and by Obama then
extending NATO into Albania and Croatia and trying to bring into it also Ukraine and some other nations bordering or near Russia.
American
President JFK didn’t allow the Khruschev regime to place nuclear
missiles 90 miles from the U.S. in Cuba in 1962, and Russian President
Putin can’t stand the Obama regime to place nuclear missiles right on Russia’s borders, but it’s happening now, and it endangers us all — not only the Russian people.
Furthermore,
with the support of both U.S. President Obama and his neo-conservative
former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (famous for her psychopathic “We came, we saw, he died, ha ha!!” comment), NATO’s current Secretary General and other top people at NATO are now increasingly beating the drums for war against Russia,
and are using for ‘justification’ of it the very same lie that both
Obama and Clinton do, as Obama has stated it: Russia’s alleged ‘conquest’ of Crimea. As I have documented headlining “The Entire Case for Sanctions Against Russia Is Pure Lies”, there was no such ‘conquest’, and even Western-sponsored polls of Crimeans both before and after Crimeans voted overwhelmingly to reject the newly imposed February 2014 Obama-engineered coup-government of Ukraine
and to rejoin Russia of which Crimea had been a part until
involuntarily transferred to Ukraine by the Soviet dictator Khrushchev
in 1954, showed the very same overwhelmingly high level of public support for rejoining with Russia that was shown in the plebiscite-results.
The
U.S. government accepts the right of self-determination of peoples, so
that the residents of Scotland can vote to separate from the UK if they
wish, and the residents of Catalonia can vote to separate from Spain if
they wish, but where it comes now to the right of the residents of Crimea, who had voted 75% for Viktor Yanukovych and who were disgusted by Obama’s overthrow of him, to separate from the newly-imposed Obama-coup-regime in Kiev (and even the head of Stratfor called it “the most blatant coup in history”), Obama and Clinton reject that same right for the Crimean people. Why do they reject it? They have
to do this, in order to support NATO’s war-buildup against Russia, and
support their surrounding Russia with extremely dangerous missiles. (In
fact, Russia’s alleged ‘seizure’ of Crimea is even the ‘justification’
that Obama gives for his economic sanctions against Russia; so, he’s deep into lying about it.)
The
expansion of NATO up to Russia’s borders proves NATO’s (that’s to say,
the U.S. aristocracy’s, and its subordinate national aristocracies
represented in NATO) aggressive intent against Russia. Putin had
done everything he could to have friendly relations with America, but
now under Obama the relationship has plunged into clearly a pre-war
situation, not only in Syria, and Ukraine, and elsewhere on Russia’s
borders, but in American propaganda against Russia.
The addition of installation now of BMD is flashing to all Russians the
extreme-danger signal, and if Russia therefore launches a surprise
nuclear attack against the U.S. at some time before the BMD becomes
fully operational, the blame for it belongs to George Herbert Walker Bush, and Bill Clinton, and Barack Obama, and all who have lied so viciously against Russia and who so blatantly violated the promise that the George Herbert Walker Bush regime had made to Gorbachev in 1990.
Fair
is fair, regardless of the particular nation, and unfair is unfair,
regardless of the particular nation; and, in this case, clearly, the U.S. government has been extremely
unfair to the Russian people, and so the Russian government’s patience
with the lies of the U.S. government and of its NATO stooges, might have
a limit that precedes activation of BMD — this would mean a Russian
first-strike (and they won’t warn about it in advance). They
don’t want to be sitting ducks. And they all know that only fools think
that disabling an opponent’s ability to retaliate is only a
defensive act. Any intelligent person knows that it can be also an
extremely aggressive act. And the coup in Ukraine, which started to be
organized in the U.S. Embassy in Kiev by no later than 1 March 2013 — a year before the coup itself — was an extremely hostile and aggressive act against not only Yanukovych, but also against Russia.
The way in which Obama and Clinton are endangering all of us is that, if Russia waits and the BMD (which itself is ‘justified’ only on the basis of lies)
that’s now starting to be installed, turns out to work, then only
Russia will immediately be reduced to nuclear char; but, if it doesn’t work, then both sides will be destroyed; and, if Russia doesn’t even wait to find out, but instead strikes first, then only the U.S. and maybe other NATO nations will immediately be destroyed; and, in any case,
the level of nuclear contamination of the entire world, and the amount
of earth that will be thrown up into the high atmosphere and generate a
global freezing (“nuclear winter”) that will be just as extreme and far
more sudden than the otherwise global warming, will make life not even
worth living.
Obama and Clinton aren’t the only Americans who are pushing this needless vile brinksmanship, but it is needless; it’s entirely unnecessary, and, on the U.S.-NATO side, it’s based clearly upon lies; so, the U.S. government must repudiate it and halt the BMD, right now.
If
there’s anything sane that’s still remaining in American politics, this
issue will be the central issue of the 2016 Presidential campaign.
Because, if things continue drifting in the way that they have been
drifting, then the world-as-it’s-always-been-known will soon end, and
what replaces it will become hell-on-Earth, everywhere. And America’s leaders will have been the cause of it.
Any Presidential candidate who doesn’t condemn both Obama and Clinton for it, has got no rational justification for receiving anyone’s
vote. Because, if the next U.S. President doesn’t forthrightly
repudiate and reverse this pathological policy, then we’d all better somehow join the aristocracy and buy deep nuclear bunkers, with years of supplies to outlast the first phases of nuclear decay. Except that the people who have already done so are fools for even wanting to live in such a post-war world. But at least they’re smart enough to recognize that things are heading in this direction.
The only solution to it is to avoid electing Presidents such as the ones we’ve been
electing. Instead, to elect a President who condemns them — and for the
sane reasons, not for other, insane, ones. Because this issue is too
important to continue any insanity.
0 comments:
Post a Comment