Michael Pollan: 5 Reasons the Paleo Diet Is B.S. -- And How to Eat Right
Photo Credit: Shutterstock
January 22, 2014
|
The paleo diet is hot. Those who follow it are attempting, they say, to mimic our ancient ancestors—minus the animal-skin fashions and the total lack of technology, of course. The adherents eschew what they believe comes from modern agriculture (wheat, dairy, legumes, for instance) and rely instead on meals full of meat, nuts, and vegetables—foods they claim are closer to what hunter-gatherers ate.
The trouble with that view, however, is that what they're eating is probably nothing like the diet of hunter-gatherers, says Michael Pollan, author of a number of best-selling books on food and agriculture, including Cooked: A Natural History of Transformation. "I don't think we really understand…well the proportions in the ancient diet," argues Pollan on the latest episode of the Inquiring Minds podcast (stream below). "Most people who tell you with great confidence that this is what our ancestors ate—I think they're kind of blowing smoke."
The wide-ranging interview with Pollan
covered the science and history of cooking, the importance of
microbes—tiny organisms such as bacteria—in our diet, and surprising new
research on the intelligence of plants. Here are five suggestions he
offered about cooking and eating well.
1. Meat: It's not always for dinner. Cooking
meat transforms it: Roasting it or braising it for hours in liquid
unlocks complex smells and flavors that are hard to resist. In addition
to converting it into something we crave, intense heat also breaks down
the meat into nutrients that we can more easily access. Our ancient
ancestors likely loved the smell of meat on an open fire as much as we
do.
But human populations in different
regions of the world ate a variety of diets. Some ate more; some ate
less. They likely ate meat only when they could get it, and then they
gorged. Richard Wrangham, author of Catching Fire: How Cooking Made Us Human,
says diets from around the world ranged greatly in the percentage of
calories from meat. It's not cooked meat that made us human, he says,
but rather cooked food.
In any case, says Pollan, today's meat is nothing like that of the hunter-gatherer.
One problem with the paleo diet is that
"they're assuming that the options available to our caveman ancestors
are still there," he argues. But "unless you're willing to hunt your
food, they're not."
As Pollan explains, the animals bred by
modern agriculture—which are fed artificial diets of corn and grains,
and beefed up with hormones and antibiotics—have nutritional profiles
far from wild game.
Pastured animals, raised on diets of
grass and grubs, are closer to their wild relatives; even these,
however, are nothing like the lean animals our ancestors ate.
So, basically, enjoy meat in moderation, and choose pastured meat if possible.
2. Humans can live on bread alone. Paleo
obsessives might shun bread, but bread, as it has been traditionally
made, is a healthy way to access a wide array of nutrients from grains.
In Cooked, Pollan describes how
bread might have been first created: Thousands of years ago, someone
probably in ancient Egypt discovered a bubbling mash of grains and
water, the microbes busily fermenting what would become dough. And
unbeknownst to those ancient Egyptians, the fluffy, delicious new
substance had been transformed by those microbes. Suddenly the grains
provided even more bang for the bite.
As University of California-Davis food
chemist Bruce German told Pollan in an interview, "You could not survive
on wheat flour. But you can survive on bread." Microbes start to digest
the grains, breaking them down in ways that free up more of the
healthful parts. If bread is compared to another method of cooking
flour—basically making it into porridge—"bread is dramatically more
nutritious," says Pollan.
Still, common bread made from white flour
and commercial yeast doesn't have the same nutritional content as the
slowly fermented and healthier sourdough bread you might find at a local
baker. Overall, though, bread can certainly be part of a nutritious
diet. (At least, for those who don't suffer from celiac disease.)
3. Eat more microbes. Microbes
play a key role not just in bread, but in all sorts of fermented foods:
beer, cheese, yogurt, kimchi, miso, sauerkraut, pickles. Thousands—even
hundreds—of years ago, before electricity made refrigeration widely
available, fermentation was one of the best means of preserving foods.
And now we know that microbes, such as those in our gut, play a key role in
our health, as well. The microbes we eat in foods like pickles may not
take up a permanent home in our innards; rather, they seem to be more
akin to transient visitors, says Pollan. Still, "fermented foods provide
a lot of compounds that gut microbes like," and he says he makes sure
to eat some fermented vegetables every day.
4. Raw food is for the birds (too much of it, anyway). There's
paleo, and then there's the raw diet. Folks who eat raw tout the health
benefits of the approach, saying that they’re accessing the full,
complete nutrients available because they're not heating, and thus
destroying, their dinner. But that's simply wrong. We cook to get our
hands on morenutrients, not fewer. According to Wrangham, the
one thing absolutely all cultures have in common is that they cook their
food. He points out that women who move towards 100 percent raw diets
often stop ovulating, because even if in theory they're tossing
sufficient food into the blender to fulfill their caloric needs, they
simply can't absorb enough from the uncooked food.
Our hefty cousins, the apes, spend half
their waking hours gnawing on raw sustenance, about six hours per day.
In contrast, we spend only one hour. "So in a sense, cooking opens up
this space for other activities," says Pollan. "It's very hard to have
culture, it's very hard to have science, it's very hard to have all the
things we count as important parts of civilization if you're spending
half of all your waking hours chewing." Cooked food: It gave us
civilization.
5. Want to be healthy? Cook. Pollan
says the food industry has done a great job of convincing eaters that
corporations can cook better than we can. The problem is, it's not true.
And the food that others cook is nearly always less healthful than that
which we cook ourselves.
"Part of the problem is that we've been
isolated as cooks for too long," says Pollan. "I found that to the
extent you can make cooking itself a social experience, it can be a lot
more fun."
But how can we convince folks to give it a
try? "I think we have to lead with pleasure," he says. Aside from the
many health benefits, cooking is also "one of the most interesting
things humans know how to do and have done for a very long time. And we
get that, or we wouldn't be watching so much cooking on TV. There is
something fascinating about it. But it's even more fascinating when you
do it yourself."
For the full interview, in which Pollan
also discusses cheese made from his belly button microbes and the latest
research on how plants can hear insects snacking on neighboring leaves,
listen here:
0 comments:
Post a Comment