Submitted by Tyler Durden on 02/03/2016 22:30 -0500http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-02-03/paul-craig-roberts-there-no-freedom-without-truthAuthored by Paul Craig Roberts,
“This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The
total influence — economic, political, even spiritual — is felt in
every city, every statehouse, every office of the federal government. We
recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not
fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and
livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society. In
the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of
unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the
military–industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists, and will persist. We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes.
We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable
citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and
military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals so
that security and liberty may prosper together.”
- President Dwight D. Eisenhower
Dwight D. Eisenhower was a five-star general in charge of the
Normandy Invasion and a popular two-term President of the United States.
Today he would be called a “conspiracy theorist.”
Were Ike to be issuing his warning from the White House today,
conservative Republicans like Senators Lindsey Graham (R-SC) and Marco
Rubio (R-FL) would be
screaming at Ike for impugning the motives of “the patriotic industry that protects our freedom.”
Neoconservatives such as William Kristol would be demanding to know
why President Eisenhower was issuing warnings about our own
military-industrial complex instead of warning about the threat
presented by the Soviet military.
The presstitute media would be implying that Ike was going a bit senile in his old age, a tactic the presstitutes used against President Reagan as he struggled to end stagflation and the Cold War.
By January 17, 1961, when Eisenhower issued his warning in his
farewell address to the American People, it was already too late.
Cold
Warriors had had their hooks into the American taxpayer for 15 years
after the end of WW II, and the military-industrial complex had replaced
“mom and apple pie” as the most venerated and entrenched US interest. The Dulles brothers ran the State Department and CIA and overthrew governments at will. (
Read The Brothers)
The military-industrial complex had learned that regardless of the
protestations of high-ranking military officers, no cost-overrun, no
matter how egregious, went unpaid. Armaments industries and military
bases were spread all over the country and were important considerations
for every senator and many congressional districts. The chairmen of
House and Senate military appropriations subcommittees and armed
services committees were already dependent on campaign contributions
from the military-industrial complex and for cushy jobs should they lose
an election.
The Cold War was a profitable business that served many, and that is why it lasted so long.
There was never any threat of the Red Army invading Europe. Stalin
declared “socialism in one country” and purged the Communist Party of
the Trotskyist element that preached world revolution. An accommodation
could have been reached, except that for the first time ever the
military-industrial complex saw that it could keep the war business
going for decades and perhaps forever.
George F. Kennan predicted that should the Soviet Union “sink
tomorrow under the waters of the ocean,” another adversary would have to
be invented. “Anything else would be an unacceptable shock to the
American economy.”
When the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991, the “Soviet threat”
was replaced with the “Muslim threat” and the “War on Terror” took over
from the Cold War. Despite a succession of false flag attacks
and warnings of a “thirty years war,” a few thousand lightly armed
jihadists were an insufficient replacement for the Soviet Union and its
thousands of nuclear ICBMs. It was an uncomfortable notion that the
“world’s only superpower” could not dispose of a few terrorists.
So we are back to the Cold War with Russia. The propaganda is fast and furious.
“Putin is the new Hitler.” “Russia invaded Ukraine.” Russia is about to
invade the Baltics and Poland.” “Putin is a corrupt multi-billionaire.”
“Putin is scheming to recreate the Soviet Union.” These accusations
become headlines despite US military spending being a dozen or more
times higher than Russian military spending and the Russian government
expressing no hegemonic aspirations.
Eisenhower’s sucessor,
John F. Kennedy, realized that the
military-security complex was a threat, but he underestimated the threat
and paid for it with his life when he stood up to the military-security complex. In stating this fact I have joined Eisenhower as a conspiracy theorist.
(For
a hair-raising account of the threat posed to President Kennedy by
General Lyman Lemnitzer, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, read
chapter three in Richard Cottrell’s book, Gladio, NATO’s Dagger at the
Heart of Europe.)
Conspiracies are real. There are many more of them than people are aware.
Many government conspiracies are heavily documented by governments
themselves with the official records demonstrating the conspiracies
openly available to the public. Just google, for example, Operation
Gladio or the Northwoods Project.
These conspiracies alone are
sufficient to chastise those uninformed Western peoples who go around
saying, “our government would never kill its own people.”
Perhaps Russian studies provided my introduction to government
conspiracies against their own people. I learned that the Tsar’s secret
police set off bombs and killed people in order to blame and arrest
labor agitators. I was skeptical of this account and wondered if it was a
reflection of left-wing bias against Tsarist Russia. Some years later I
asked my colleague, Robert Conquest, at the Hoover Institution at
Stanford University if the account was true. He replied that the story
is true as is known from the released secret police files that are part
of the Hoover Institution’s archives.
False flag attacks are used by governments in order to pursue secret agendas that they cannot publicly acknowledge. If President George W. Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney had said:
“We
are going to attack Iraq and a half dozen other countries in order to
exercise hegemony over the Middle East, steal their oil, and clear the
path for Israel to steal the entirety of the West Bank of Palestine,
diverting taxpayers’ resources from serving the American people into the
pockets of the armaments industries and spilling the blood of your
parents, spouses, children, and siblings," even the American sheeple would have resisted.
Instead, following the famous advice of Hitler’s chief propagandist, they said:
“Our country has been attacked!”
Generally speaking, an observant person with a bit of education can recognize a false flag attack.
However, few people pay attention beyond what the official media says,
and the media no longer investigates and questions but simply repeats
the official story. Therefore, only a few realize what has really
happened, and when these few open their mouths they are discredited as
“conspiracy theorists.”
This method of control might be wearing thin. There have been
so many false flag “terrorist attacks” in the 21st century that there
are now thousands of experts labeled as “conspiracy theorist.” For
example, the 9/11 Truth Movement consists of thousands of high rise
architects, structural engineers, demolition experts, nano-chemists,
physicists, firefighters and first responders, civilian and military
pilots, and former high government officials. Collectively these experts
represent far more knowledge and experience than the 9/11 Commission,
which did nothing but write down whatever the government told the
commission, NIST, a collection of people whose incomes and careers
depend on the government, and the presstitutes who can barely manage
arithemetic, much less the mathematics of controlled demolition.
The neoconservatives, who controlled the George W. Bush regime,
called for a “New Pearl Harbor” so that they could begin their wars of
conquest in the Middle East.
A “New Pearl Harbor” is what 9/11 gave them. Was this a coincidence or a Gulf of Tonkin or a Reichstag fire or a Tzarist secret police or Operation Gladio bomb?
The charge, “conspiracy theory,” is used to prevent investigation.
9/11 was not investigated. Indeed, as many experts have pointed out,
there was a conscious effort to remove and destroy the evidence before
it could be investigated. The 9/11 families had to lobby and protest for
a solid year before the Bush regime consented to the totally controlled
9/11 Commission.
The
Boston Marathon Bombing was not investigated. A scripted story was issued and repeated by the media. The
San Bernardino shootings were not investigated. Again, a pre-scripted story took the place of investigation.
The success of false flag attacks in the US led to their use in the UK and France.
The Charlie Hebdo affair was not investigated and the official
explanation makes no sense. The story has been closed with all the loose
ends dangling. For example, why did a French police official
investigating the crime allegedly commit suicide in his police office in
the early hours of the morning, and why was his family denied the
autopsy report? What happened to this disappeared story? Why did the
police finger a third participant in the attack as the “getaway driver”
who had an iron clad alibi? If the police were so totally wrong about
this member of the gang, how do we know they are right about the two men
they shot to death. How come alleged perpetrators of “terrorist
attacks” are always killed before they can talk? How come the only story
we ever get is what the government says?
How can people be so gullible after the Gulf of Tonkin, Operation Gladio, etc.?
Apparently the
Charlie Hebdo attack was insufficient
for the purpose, and now France has had what is called “the Paris
attack,” an even more unbelievable event, evidence for which is missing.
This false flag attack was too much for Kevin Barrett who assembled a
collection of skeptical essays from 26 people into a book,
Another French False Flag: Bloody Tracks From Paris To San Bernardino.
Twenty-four of these contributors do not believe the official story.
Does this make them “conspiracy theorists,” or does this make them brave
souls who are concerned that Reichstag fire type events are replacing
Western civil liberty with fascist police states?
Ask yourself, why are those trying to preserve liberty denounced?
What incentive does contributor A.K. Dewdney, Professor Emeritus
at the University of Western Ontario, author of ten books about science
and mathematics, have to be a conspiracy theorist?
What incentive does Philip Giraldi, former CIA case officer and
Executive Director of the Council for the National Interest, have to be a
conspiracy theorist?
What incentive does Anthony Hall, Professor of Globalization
Studies at the University of Lethbridge in Alberta, Canada, whose latest
book has been endorsed by the American Library Association as “a
scholarly tour de force,” have to be a conspiracy theorist?
What incentive does Mujahid Kamran, Vice Chancellor of Punjab
University, Lahore, Pakistan, a Fulbright Scholar and recipient of
numerous awards, have to be a conspiracy theorist?
What incentive does Stephen Lendman, syndicated columnist and
host on the Progressive Radio News Hour, have to be a conspiracy
theorist?
What incentive does James Petras, Bartle Professor of Sociology at Binghamton University, have to be a conspiracy theorist?
What incentive does Alain Soral, one of France’s public intellectuals, have to be a conspiracy theorist?
What incentive does Robert David Steele, former CIA Clandestine Services Officer, have to be a conspiracy theorist?
The neocons’ whores in the
Western media who call these people “conspiracy theorists” are so stupid and unintelligent as to be unqualified to express any opinion.
Dear Western Peoples, if
you wish to be able to walk down the streets of your cities without
being accosted by police, demanded to present identity papers, searched,
detained indefinitely or assassinated without due process of law, if
you wish to be able to express your opinion about “your” government and
its use of your tax payments, if you wish to be able to discuss current
affairs or your personal affairs without being recorded by the NSA or
the equivalent in your own country or by both, if you wish to be able to
act on your moral conscience and to protest the violence the West
applies to Muslims and others unfavored by powerful Western interests,
such as Palestinians, if you wish to live in the freedom that was
achieved in the West after centuries of struggle, wake up, find time
from less meaningful pursuits to become aware of what is being stolen
from you. It is late in the game. If you do not stand up for truth, you will have no freedom as there is no freedom without truth.
“For
this former Republican, and perhaps for others, the only choice will be
to vote for Hillary Clinton. The party cannot be saved, but the country
still can be.” —Robert Kagan
“I
have a sense that she’s one of the more competent members of the
current administration and it would be interesting to speculate about
how she might perform were she to be president.” —Dick Cheney
“I’ve
known her for many years now, and I respect her intellect. And she ran
the State Department in the most effective way that I’ve ever seen.” —Henry Kissinger
