Obama administration sets record for withholding gov't files

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Obama administration set a record again for censoring government files or outright denying access to them last year under the U.S. Freedom of Information Act, according to a new analysis of federal data by The Associated Press.
The government took longer to turn over files when it provided any, said more regularly that it couldn't find documents and refused a record number of times to turn over files quickly that might be especially newsworthy.
It also acknowledged in nearly 1 in 3 cases that its initial decisions to withhold or censor records were improper under the law — but only when it was challenged.
Its backlog of unanswered requests at year's end grew remarkably by 55 percent to more than 200,000. It also cut by 375, or about 9 percent, the number of full-time employees across government paid to look for records. That was the fewest number of employees working on the issue in five years.
The government's new figures, published Tuesday, covered all requests to 100 federal agencies during fiscal 2014 under the Freedom of Information law, which is heralded globally as a model for transparent government. They showed that despite disappointments and failed promises by the White House to make meaningful improvements in the way it releases records, the law was more popular than ever. Citizens, journalists, businesses and others made a record 714,231 requests for information. The U.S. spent a record $434 million trying to keep up. It also spent about $28 million on lawyers' fees to keep records secret.
"This disappointing track record is hardly the mark of an administration that was supposed to be the most transparent in history," said Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, who has co-sponsored legislation with Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., to improve the Freedom of Information law. Their effort died in the House last year.
The new figures showed the government responded to 647,142 requests, a 4 percent decrease over the previous year. It more than ever censored materials it turned over or fully denied access to them, in 250,581 cases or 39 percent of all requests. Sometimes, the government censored only a few words or an employee's phone number, but other times it completely marked out nearly every paragraph on pages.
On 215,584 other occasions, the government said it couldn't find records, a person refused to pay for copies or the government determined the request to be unreasonable or improper.
The White House touted its success under its own analysis. It routinely excludes from its assessment instances when it couldn't find records, a person refused to pay for copies or the request was determined to be improper under the law, and said under this calculation it released all or parts of records in 91 percent of requests — still a record low since President Barack Obama took office using the White House's own math.
"We actually do have a lot to brag about," White House spokesman Josh Earnest said.
Earnest on Wednesday praised agencies for releasing information before anyone requested it, such as the salaries and titles of White House employees. He cited more than 125,000 sets of data posted on a website, data.gov, which include historical temperature charts, records of agricultural fertilizer consumption, Census data, fire deaths and college crime reports.
"When it comes to our record on transparency, we have a lot to be proud of," he told reporters aboard Air Force One. "And frankly, it sets a standard that future administrations will have to live up to."
Separately, the Justice Department congratulated the Agriculture and State departments for finishing work on their oldest 10 requests, said the Pentagon responded to nearly all requests within three months and praised the Health and Human Services Department for disclosing information about the Ebola outbreak and immigrant children caught crossing U.S. borders illegally.
The government's responsiveness under the open records law is an important measure of its transparency. Under the law, citizens and foreigners can compel the government to turn over copies of federal records for zero or little cost. Anyone who seeks information through the law is generally supposed to get it unless disclosure would hurt national security, violate personal privacy or expose business secrets or confidential decision-making in certain areas. It cited such exceptions a record 554,969 times last year.
Under the president's instructions, the U.S. should not withhold or censor government files merely because they might be embarrassing, but federal employees last year regularly misapplied the law. In emails that AP obtained from the National Archives and Records Administration about who pays for Michelle Obama's expensive dresses, the agency blacked-out a sentence under part of the law intended to shield personal, private information, such as Social Security numbers, phone numbers or home addresses. But it failed to censor the same passage on a subsequent page.
The sentence: "We live in constant fear of upsetting the WH (White House)."
In nearly 1 in 3 cases, when someone challenged under appeal the administration's initial decision to censor or withhold files, the government reconsidered and acknowledged it was at least partly wrong. That was the highest reversal rate in at least five years.
The AP's chief executive, Gary Pruitt, said the news organization filed hundreds of requests for government files. Records the AP obtained revealed police efforts to restrict airspace to keep away news helicopters during violent street protests in Ferguson, Missouri. In another case, the records showed Veterans Affairs doctors concluding that a gunman who later killed 12 people had no mental health issues despite serious problems and encounters with police during the same period. They also showed the FBI pressuring local police agencies to keep details secret about a telephone surveillance device called Stingray.
"What we discovered reaffirmed what we have seen all too frequently in recent years," Pruitt wrote in a column published this week. "The systems created to give citizens information about their government are badly broken and getting worse all the time."
The U.S. released its new figures during Sunshine Week, when news organizations promote open government and freedom of information.
The AP earlier this month sued the State Department under the law to force the release of email correspondence and government documents from Hillary Rodham Clinton's tenure as secretary of state. The government had failed to turn over the files under repeated requests, including one made five years ago and others pending since the summer of 2013.
The government said the average time it took to answer each records request ranged from one day to more than 2.5 years. More than half of federal agencies took longer to answer requests last year than the previous year.
___
Online:
U.S. data: http://www.foia.gov/data.html

Reddit Passionately Wants to Discuss Censorship … But Moderators Keep Censoring Such a Discussion AND Is Reddit Turning Into “Eddit”?

Moderators Censor Discussion on Censorship

Posted on March 4, 2014 by WashingtonsBlog

 http://www.washingtonsblog.com/

The giant r/Worldnews and r/News Reddits (5 million and 2 million subscribed readers, respectively) still haven’t allowed links to Glenn Greenwald’s report on government control, infiltration, manipulation and warping of online discourse.
Our write-up on the story – as well as TechDirt’s and Examiner.com’s – were allowed.  We are sincerely grateful – as are TechDirt and Examiner.com – for the traffic.
However, we’re all upset that the moderators of the biggest Reddits are censoring Greenwald’s original story:

• TechDirt’s write up on censorship is here

• The Redditor who posted the Examiner’s story slams Reddit censorship here

• And our post on the censorship – written before the links to TechDirt, Examiner and our site were allowed -  can be read here

Ironically, our post on censorship has itself repeatedly been deleted by Reddit moderators.  In the week since I wrote it, I have repeatedly seen traffic coming from a Reddit  link to the story, and then the traffic has suddenly stopped.
Redditors not affiliated with Washington’s Blog have repeatedly submitted the story, and it has been deleted every time.
As one example, yesterday the story jumped to the front page of Reddit over the course of 2 hours:
But then it was suddenly deleted.
This shows that there is tremendous interest among Redditors themselves to discuss censorship.  But the moderators keep shutting down discussion.
This isn’t the first time the Reddit community has tried to fight back against censorship.  There has been a long and growing outrage over the issue, especially given the history of  Digg’s “Bury Brigade” destroying that site:

• Censorship Costs Reddit Thousands of Readers

• Reddit Busted Censoring Alternative Media

• Biggest Social Media Sites Censor Alternative News

Postscript:  We don’t have any opinion about whether or not moderators should keep removing our story on censorship.  We are, frankly, too biased to be objective.
We are, instead, focusing on the fact that there is tremendous pent-up desire among Redditors to discuss censorship.
In other words, the story is not that our post was deleted (again) yesterday. It’s that Redditors quickly pushed it to the front page because there is such an overwhelming desire to discuss censorship.
And the other story is that the big Reddits are still not linking directly to Glenn Greenwald’s reports.

Is Reddit Turning Into “Eddit”?

Posted on March 4, 2014 by WashingtonsBlog

More and More Editing of News Sources and Stories

I love Reddit …
I’ve been a Redditor for 6 years and – at one time – had one of the highest “Karma” scores at the site.
But Reddit seems to be turning into “Eddit” … as in censoring the most controversial stories, and censoring discussions about censorship itself.
There are whole lists of banned news sources.
And as Ward Harkavy – former editor and writer at the Village Voice – Tweets:

These Reddit censors sound worse than some of the censorious numbnut top-level editors I worked for — and worked hard to oust.

Side Note: Washington’s Blog reader AnnOnaMice coined the term “Eddit”.
We at Washington’s Blog love a good meme. For example, on February 6th, we ran a story based upon Anthony Freda’s word “Glassholes” (and his related artwork) to describe people who wear Google Glasses to spy on others.  Less than 2 weeks later, Google itself told its users “Don’t Be a Glasshole”. (Of course, we don’t know whether Google read our story or saw Freda’s artwork … or it was just part of the collective Zeitgeist.)