Showing posts with label Bitcoin. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bitcoin. Show all posts

Friday, June 26, 2015

Second Federal Agent Accused In Silk Road Bitcoin Theft To Plead Guilty

Former DEA agent Carl Force, a task force member investigating Silk Road who allegedly stole hundreds of thousands of dollars in bitcoin and extorted "Dread Pirate Roberts", joins fellow former federal agent Shaun Bridges in agreeing to plead guilty to multiple charges.


Federal Agents Silk Road
Carl Force and Shaun Bridges have now both agreed to plead guilty for their roles in bitcoin theft while on a task force investigating the Silk Road marketplace. (Image via ktvu.com)
Former DEA agent Carl Force has reportedly agreed to plead guilty to extortion, money laundering and obstruction of justice charges, according to court documents filed earlier this week. Force, along with former Secret Service agent Shaun Bridges, was accused of bitcoin theft while investigating the Silk Road online marketplace.
Force was a DEA agent assigned to a Baltimore task force investigating Silk Road. During the assignment, Force allegedly adopted multiple online personas and used them to extort “Dread Pirate Roberts”, Silk Road’s creator.
Using the online alias “Nob”, Force allegedly convinced DPR to pay him $50,000 in bitcoin in exchange for information related to the investigation. Prosecutors said that Force claimed there was no such payment while funneling the money to his own account. Force reportedly accepted two payments as “Nob” totaling about $90,000 in bitcoin.
“Nob” was also the reported recipient of $80,000 paid by DPR to kill Curtis Clark Green, a Silk Road staffer whom DPR believed had stolen over $800,000 in bitcoin. While DPR believed it was Green who was behind the theft, Green’s account had actually been taken over by Bridges unbeknownst to DPR, and Bridges was the alleged thief.
[RELATED: Former Federal Agent Accused Of Silk Road Bitcoin Theft To Plead Guilty]
Using another online alias, “French Maid”, Force allegedly extorted another $100,000 worth of bitcoin from DPR in exchange for information.
Like Truth In Media on Facebook
Force allegedly also used a third online alias, “Death From Above”, to attempt to extort $250,000 from DPR by telling him that he knew his identity. The attempt was unsuccessful.
In addition to extortion, Force is accused of freezing a customer account holding $297,000 in bitcoins in a digital currency exchange company, CoinMKT, while he was investigating Silk Road. Those funds reportedly ended up in an account belonging to Force.
A jury found that Ross Ulbricht was indeed DPR and he was found guilty of seven criminal charges related to the creation and operation of Silk Road, including drug dealing, computer hacking, and money laundering. Ulbricht was sentenced to life in prison without parole, a punishment beyond what prosecutors had advocated. He has since appealed the life sentence.
Joshua Dratel, Ulbricht’s lawyer, has said that Ulbricht did not receive a fair trial due to the fact that the allegations regarding Force and Bridges were kept secret from the defense until just before the trial. “At Mr. Ulbricht’s trial, knowing full well the corruption alleged in the complaint made public today, the government still aggressively precluded much of that evidence, and kept it from the jury,” Dratel said. “Consequently, the government improperly used the ongoing grand jury process in San Francisco as both a sword and a shield to deny Mr. Ulbricht access to and use of important evidence, and a fair trial.”

Wednesday, April 30, 2014

‘Dark Wallet’ Is About to Make Bitcoin Money Laundering Easier Than Ever

From left, Cody Wilson and Amir Taaki. Photo: Andy Greenberg
From left, Cody Wilson and Amir Taaki. Photo: Andy Greenberg
Government regulators around the world have spent the last year scrambling to prevent bitcoin from becoming the currency of choice for money launderers and black marketeers. Now their worst fears may be about to materialize in a single piece of software.
On Thursday, a collective of politically radical coders that calls itself unSystem plans to release the first version of Dark Wallet: a bitcoin application designed to protect its users’ identities far more strongly than the partial privacy protections bitcoin offers in its current form. If the program works as promised, it could neuter impending bitcoin regulations that seek to tie individuals’ identities to bitcoin ownership. By encrypting and mixing together its users’ payments, Dark Wallet seeks to enable practically untraceable flows of money online that add new fuel to the Web’s burgeoning black markets.
“This is a way of using bitcoin that mocks every attempt to sprinkle it with regulation,” says Cody Wilson, one of Dark Wallet’s two 26-year-old organizers. “It’s a way to say to the government ‘You’ve set yourself up to regulate bitcoin. Regulate this.’”
Here’s a teaser video the group posted earlier last week ahead of the software’s release:
http://www.wired.com/2014/04/dark-wallet/
Dark Wallet was conceived last summer by Wilson and Amir Taaki. Wilson first gained notoriety by creating the world’s first entirely 3D-printed gun; Taaki is an Iranian-British free-market anarchist and developer of high-profile bitcoin projects like the decentralized online marketplace prototype DarkMarket. Together they launched a crowdfunding campaign on Indiegogo in October that raised $50,000, along with tens of thousands more in bitcoin. The accompanying video promised what Wilson described as “a line in the sand” in the struggle over bitcoin’s political future. At a debate at New York’s Museum of Modern Art in March, Wilson described his intentions for Dark Wallet more directly: “It’s just money laundering software.”
Despite those provocations, financial regulators have kept mum about the project. The New York Department of Financial Services, which held hearings about bitcoin in January and says it plans to create a “bitlicense” for some bitcoin-based businesses, didn’t respond to a request for comment. In a statement to WIRED, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network wrote only that it’s “well aware of the many emerging technological efforts designed to subvert financial transparency. It’s certainly our business to be interested and vigilant with respect to any activities that may assist money laundering and other financial crimes.”
Wilson’s and Taaki’s money-laundering app is politically incendiary, but it’s not necessarily illegal, and they argue that the code is protected by First Amendment safeguards on free speech. But Wilson states plainly that he intends Dark Wallet to be used for anonymous online black markets like the Silk Road, the bitcoin-based drug bazaar seized by the FBI in October. “I want a private means for black market transactions,” says Wilson, “whether they’re for non-prescribed medical inhalers, MDMA for drug enthusiasts, or weapons.”
Nor does he deny that Dark Wallet might enable heinous crimes like child pornography, murder-for-hire, and terrorism. “Well, yes, bad things are going to happen on these marketplaces,” Wilson says. “Liberty is a dangerous thing.”
But as dangerous as Wilson’s vision may be, Dark Wallet also fills a real need for privacy in the bitcoin economy. Despite its reputation as an anonymous currency, bitcoin transactions are in some ways nakedly public–even more so than those made with traditional money. Every bitcoin payment is recorded in the public ledger known as the blockchain, copied to thousands of users’ computers and checked to prevent forgery and fraud in the Bitcoin network. If bitcoiners don’t take special pains to anonymize their coins, all of their spending can potentially be traced back to their bitcoin addresses by any corporation or government agency that cares to look.
A screenshot from Dark Wallet's interface showing its CoinJoin function. (Click to enlarge.)
A screenshot from Dark Wallet’s interface showing its CoinJoin function. (Click to enlarge.)
Dark Wallet avoids those privacy and trust problems by integrating laundering by default into every payment its users make. Its central tool is a technique called CoinJoin: Every time a user spends bitcoins, his or her transaction is combined with that of another user chosen at random who’s making a payment around the same time. If, say, Alice is buying alpaca socks from an online sock seller and Bob is buying LSD on the Silk Road, Dark Wallet will combine their transactions so that the blockchain records only a single movement of funds. The bitcoins simultaneously leave Alice’s and Bob’s addresses and are paid to the sock seller and the Silk Road. The negotiation of that multi-party transaction is encrypted, so no eavesdropper on the network can easily determine whose coins went where. To mix their coins further, users can also run CoinJoin on their bitcoins when they’re not making a real payment, instead sending them to another address they own.
One bitcoin privacy issue CoinJoin solves relates to what are known as “change addresses.” When bitcoins from any single address are spent, the unspent fraction of coins are sent back to a change address that the spender controls. Future transactions from that change address can be tied to the same user. But with each successive CoinJoin transaction, the coins are mixed with another new user’s payment, and the likelihood of guessing which change address belongs to which user is cut in half again. “When you start to join transactions, it muddles them,” says Taaki. “As you start to go down the chain, you can only be 50 percent sure the coins belong to any one person, then 25 percent, then one out of eight and then one out of sixteen. The conditional probability drops very fast.”
Dark Wallet's stealth address function. (Click to enlarge.)
Dark Wallet’s stealth address function. (Click to enlarge.)
To protect the identity of the user receiving coins instead of spending them, Dark Wallet offers a different technique known as a stealth address. Any user can ask Dark Wallet to generate a stealth address along with a secret key and then publish the stealth address online as his or her bitcoin receiving address. When another Dark Wallet user sends payment to that address, Dark Wallet is programmed to instead send the coins to another address that represents a random encryption of the stealth address. The recipient’s Dark Wallet client then scans the blockchain for any address it can decrypt with the user’s secret key, finds the stealth payment, and claims it for the user. “The important thing is that when someone pastes your stealth address into [blockchain search tool] blockchain.info, absolutely nothing shows up,” says Peter Todd, a bitcoin consultant who advised Dark Wallet on the stealth address feature. “The payment is entirely hidden.”
Dark Wallet’s developers admit it’s still at an early stage, and that, like any cryptography project, it will only prove itself and patch its bugs over time. Taaki says, for instance, that the software will eventually combine more than two users’ payments in every CoinJoin transaction, and also integrate the anonymity software Tor to better protect users’ IP addresses. In its current form, Taaki says Dark Wallet protects IPs only by obscuring them behind the server that negotiates CoinJoin transactions, which may still leave users vulnerable to identification by sophisticated traffic analysis. “It’s not foolproof, but it’s a strong tool,” says Taaki. “And it’s going to get better.”
In the meantime, the group isn’t shying from a confrontation with regulators. Even its name is chosen specifically to reference the FBI’s repeated warnings about the Internet “going dark“–that encryption tools could effectively turn off law enforcement’s ability to surveil criminal and terrorist suspects online.
“Dark Wallet is a way to reify that nightmare and give it back to them,” says Wilson. “There is a ‘go dark’ problem, and we’re going to have it with bitcoin. That’s what bitcoin is for. That’s what we want to see.”
http://www.wired.com/2014/04/dark-wallet/

Wednesday, March 26, 2014

IRS says Bitcoin is taxable (We need to tell the IRS to take a hike...)

The Internal Revenue Service has issued a formal notice saying it can tax Bitcoin transactions, calling it a property -- not a currency.

That's big news for Bitcoin, the independent, electronic money that is growing in popularity. It's not a blessing or a curse by the U.S. government -- but it is a sign that authorities are taking the digital money more seriously.
On Tuesday, the IRS notice said payments worth at least $600 and made with bitcoins will be taxed the same way the agency treats property transactions. That includes payments made with bitcoins, gains realized by investing in it, and income derived from producing them on your computer, a process known as "mining."
If you pay your employees with bitcoins, that would have to go on your staff's W-2 forms, and they would have to pay federal income tax on it. Paying an independent contractor? They have to put bitcoin payments on their 1099.
"A payment made using virtual currency is subject to information reporting to the same extent as any other payment made in property," the IRS said.
Related: What is Bitcoin?
So, while it's not a "currency" in the legal sense of the word, it is still a virtual currency. The IRS admits Bitcoin and other electronic tokens sure function like a real currency. But the agency holds back from applying that sort of definition because "but it does not have legal tender status in any jurisdiction."
Though bitcoins are virtual, you can buy real things with them -- and others are willing to pay for them. But they're not backed by gold or issued by any government.
Still many governments are attempting to regulate bitcoins, including the United Kingdom, Germany, and Singapore. The IRS' notice serves as one of the first attempts by the U.S. government to regulate the digital money.
The IRS notice says bitcoins must be valued at their "fair market value" at the time you acquire it. That's a bit tricky, because the price of a bitcoin changes all day long. On Tuesday, it hovered at $580. But it's been as high as $600 and as low as $550 in the last week alone.
The IRS said taxpayers may rely on the going prices at online exchanges. The largest in the world right now are Bitstamp, Bitfinex and BTC-E.
http://money.cnn.com/2014/03/25/technology/innovation/irs-bitcoin/index.html?iid=Lead

 

Tuesday, March 4, 2014

A Second BitCoin Exchange Goes Bankrupt


Only a month after Mt. Gox, one of the biggest bitcoin exchanges in the world, went bankrupt, a second exchange has permanently closed its doors due to theft.

Mt. Gox folded due to massive mismanagement, losing millions in bitcoins when it abruptly closed early in February. A major contributor to the closing occurred after the virtual currency exchange found it had been hacked and $500 million in bitcoin stolen.
It is estimated that Mt. Gox has some $64 million in liabilities after the shut down with about seven percent of all bitcoins in existence disappearing with the failure.
Now, bitcoin exchange service Flexcoin has also announced its failure due to theft by hacking.
Now when users go to the Felxcoin mainpage, they get an announcement of the hacking.
On March 2nd 2014 Flexcoin was attacked and robbed of all coins in the hot wallet. The attacker made off with 896 BTC, dividing them into these two addresses:
1NDkevapt4SWYFEmquCDBSf7DLMTNVggdu
1QFcC5JitGwpFKqRDd9QNH3eGN56dCNgy6
As Flexcoin does not have the resources, assets, or otherwise to come back from this loss, we are closing our doors immediately.
Users who put their coins into cold storage will be contacted by Flexcoin and asked to verify their identity. Once identified, cold storage coins will be transferred out free of charge. Cold storage coins were held offline and not within reach of the attacker. All other users will be directed to Flexcoin's "Terms of service" located at "Flexcoin.com/118.html" a document which was agreed on, upon signing up with Flexcoin.
Flexcoin will attempt to work with law enforcement to trace the source of the hack.
Bitcoin reached a high of $1,117 per coin on December 4, but after the Mt. Gox failure it fell to less than half that amount.
This incident is yet another example of the instability in virtual currencies at this time.
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/03/04/A-Second-BitCoin-Exchange-Goes-Bankrupt

Monday, February 10, 2014

Meet Patrick Byrne: Bitcoin Messiah, CEO of Overstock, Scourge of Wall Street

Overstock.com CEO and chairman Patrick Byrne. Photo: Joe Pug/WIRED
Overstock.com CEO and chairman Patrick Byrne. Photo: Joe Pugliese/WIRED
Patrick Byrne says the zombie apocalypse is coming, and there’s one thing that can save us: bitcoin.
He tells me this during a phone call from his car, a black Tesla Model S that’s winding its way through the mountains above Salt Lake City, on its way to Byrne’s home in the Utah ski country. Byrne is the CEO and chairman of Salt Lake’s Overstock.com, one of the world’s largest online retailers with more than $1.3 billion a year in sales, and he’s about to place an enormous bet on bitcoin, the digital currency that exists only on the internet.
In the estimation of many leading economists, bitcoin is a fatally flawed idea shaped by people who don’t really understand how money works. But Byrne is an unorthodox thinker, a three-time cancer survivor with a PhD in philosophy who’s never been afraid to fight for what the rest of the world sees as complete madness. Though he runs a company that’s publicly traded on Wall Street, he spent much of the last decade accusing Wall Street’s biggest brokers of widespread corruption — not to mention Wall Street hedge funds, analysts, reporters, and government regulators — arguing in the most grandiloquent terms that their greed would eventually bring the country crashing down. It’s no surprise that his maverick career would collide with the equally iconoclastic bitcoin. It’s as if his whole life has been leading to this.

‘Someday, either zombies walk the Earth or something close to that. Bitcoin is the solution’
— Patrick Byrne
As he drives to his mountain cabin, Byrne reveals that his company is a week away from accepting payments in bitcoin, and he sees this as a small but important step toward a financial revolution the world so desperately needs. He has long warned that our economy is hurtling toward another massive recession — what he calls the zombie apocalypse — and he believes bitcoin can shelter us from the fallout.
If the digital currency reaches its true potential, he tells me, it might even avert this apocalypse all-together. “Someday, either zombies walk the Earth or something close to that,” says Byrne, the son of the man who built the GEICO insurance empire, Jack Byrne, and a protege of Warren Buffet, the most successful investor in the history of Wall Street. “Bitcoin is the solution.”
In recent months, countless others have floated bitcoin as a panacea for the world’s financial ills. But like Marc Andreessen, one of the founding fathers of the web browser, who has also put his weight behind the digital currency, Byrne brings more than highfalutin metaphors to the table. The 51-year-old has proven that, beneath his wonderfully entertaining and often perplexing way of describing the world, he has a knack for seeing where things are going before others do.
The problem with the modern economy, Byrne says, is that it rests on the whims of our government and our big banks, that each has the power to create money that’s backed by nothing but themselves. Thanks to what’s called fractional reserve banking, a bank can take in $10 in deposits, but then loan out $100. The government can make more dollars at any time, instantly reducing the currency’s value. Eventually, he says, laying down a classic libertarian metaphor, this “magic money tree” will come crashing down.
But bitcoin is different. It’s like online gold: The supply of the digital currency is controlled by software running across a worldwide network of computers, and its value is decided not by the feds or the big banks, but by the people. “It can make our country more robust,” says Byrne, a disciple of the Austrian school of economics, which holds that our economy should rest on the judgments of individuals, not a central authority. “We want a money that some government mandarin can’t just whisk into existence with a pen stroke.”
Zombies. Magic money trees. Mandarins. As Byrne admits, it’s a ten-dollar answer to my ten-cent question about his plans for the future of Overstock.com, and although I know the man well, I can’t help but wonder how much of this is just him calling attention to himself. But a week after this phone call, Byrne will make good on his promise, as Overstock becomes the first major online retailer to accept payments in bitcoin, letting you buy everything from patio furniture to smartphone cases with the fledgling digital currency. And the following month, during Overstock’s quarterly earnings call, he will reveal that he has personally converted millions of dollars into bitcoin. The Overstock CEO is placing more than one big bet on an unpredictable future, but Byrne has proven himself prescient before — about the internet and the media as well as the economy.
It’s only natural that Overstock would be the first big-name company to embrace bitcoin, and you can bet that Byrne is serious about pushing the digital currency into the everyday world. On one level, Overstock is your basic bargain retailer, a company that will sell you just about anything on the cheap. But under the leadership of Byrne — who’s not only a doctor of philosophy but a onetime amateur boxer — this is also a company that’s seven years into a lawsuit that accuses venerable investment banks Goldman Sachs and Merrill Lynch of a “massive, illegal stock market manipulation scheme.”

‘He’s not just an opinionated jerk, though it sometimes sounds that way’
— Bill Hambrecht
At times, his battles with Wall Street have left him a lonely figure, belittled by the establishment. For years, large portions of the financial press questioned his sanity as he so vehemently — and so colorfully — claimed that some of the biggest names on Wall Street were complicit in a scheme to drive Overstock and other companies out of business using a loophole in the stock market. But after the financial crash of 2008, the Securities and Exchange Commission moved to close that very hole. And in the years since, Overstock has established itself as a profitable business, even as Byrne continues his crusade against Wall Street.
“He’s not just an opinionated jerk, though it sometimes sounds that way,” says Bill Hambrecht, the investment banker who helped Byrne take Overstock public in 2002 using what’s called a Dutch auction, a method that loosens the influence of the big Wall Street banks, preventing them from taking their typically enormous cut of an IPO. “He puts us on a little bit, just to bring attention to the issues. But he has brought attention to them, and though he has made some wrong calculations, he’s hung in there, and he has built a really good business — something I don’t think he’s gotten proper credit for.”
Adopting bitcoin is the next step along this same road. As Overstock embraces the digital currency, Byrne predicts it will spur other big names to follow its lead, including rival Amazon, and push the world toward a future where bitcoin is a true alternative to the dollar. But, looking further down the road, as he is wont to do, he also believes that the very public, math-driven system that underpins bitcoin can remake Wall Street, eliminating the market loopholes he has railed against for so many years.

The Sith Lord

Patrick Byrne calls it his finest moment. In August 2005, during an hour-long conference call, he told an army of investors and reporters that Wall Street was plagued by a campaign to exploit a flaw in the stock settlement system and make millions at the expense of innocent companies, including Overstock, whose share price was in free-fall. The scheme, he said, was driven by a “Miscreants Ball” of players, including hedge funds, financial analysts, government regulators, private detectives, trial lawyers, perhaps the mafia, and even the press itself.
At one point, he went so far as to say that this sweeping campaign was orchestrated by a single mastermind, someone he called the “Sith Lord.” It became known as the “Sith Lord call.”
Over the previous six months, Byrne had waged an underground battle against those he believed were trying to bury his company and others like it. But the call brought his efforts into the mainstream, and it would define Byrne in the popular press and across the internet for years to come.
Though Byrne sees the call as his finest moment — a moment when he exposed the dark underbelly of the financial world — much of the press painted it as poppycock. The next day, he appeared in the The New York Post with a UFO flying over his head. And as he pushed back in pointed, clever, and sometimes angry ways — insisting that the press was complicit in the schemes he was fighting, that reporters were too close to the hedge funds and banks they were covering — the heat on him only grew.
At one point, he accused Fortune reporter Bethany McClean of “giving Goldman traders blowjobs.” And this did not lead to more favorable coverage from Fortune or the rest of the financial media. “Maybe the Sith Lord is actually Patrick Byrne himself — because he has become his own worst enemy,” McClean later wrote in Fortune. “Nietzsche said it best: ‘Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster.’” In The New York Times, veteran financial columnist Joe Nocera branded the conference call “loony beyond belief” and described Byrne as a menace who harassed reporters just to silence criticism of his company.
In the realm of public perception, it was quite a tumble for Byrne. After he launched Overstock in 1999 — using the internet to reinvent the flea market business, selling discount and clearance and, yes, overstock goods on the cheap — he was a golden boy of the dot-com revolution, an executive with a pedigree the financial media couldn’t resist. As a teenager, he would skip school to spend afternoons with Warren Buffet, his “Dutch uncle,” whose Berkshire Hathaway eventually purchased his father’s company. He studied Mandarin at Dartmouth and philosophy at Stanford, and after he finished his PhD, Buffet tapped him to run one of Berkshire’s many companies, a midwestern outfit that made uniforms for policeman, firefighters, and the military. “I was the only goy in the schmata trade,” Byrne remembers. And as the first wave of dot-coms went belly up, his new company used this to its advantage, turning many of those bankrupt dot-coms into suppliers by snapping up their inventory.
He was also tall and blonde and classically handsome. And he was a three-time cancer survivor. In his twenties, Byrne was diagnosed with testicular cancer, and it metastasized throughout this body. “His mother called me and said: ‘If you want to say goodbye to Pat, this is the weekend. The doctor doesn’t expect him to live much longer,’” remembers Brown University professor Onesimo Almeida, a close friend who first met Byrne in early-’80s China, sitting in the lobby of the Bejing Hotel. “When we went to see him, he was skin and bones and his voice had changed to this high-pitched squeal. He said: ‘I think that I’m turning this around. I’m starting to feel better.’” After Byrne fought back from this low point, the cancer returned twice more, and twice more, he fought back. It was a narrative the press lapped up time and again.
But after the Sith Lord call, all the praise turned to scorn. In addition to such enormous criticism from Fortune and The Times, he received a constant stream of online vitriol from an army of other news outlets and pundits, including, most notably, a former BusinessWeek reporter named Gary Weiss, who ran a blog that seemed to exist only as a means of belittling the Overstock CEO.

Short Selling Gets Naked

Some call it a crusade. Others call it a jihad. But Byrne calls it his mitzvah — a holy mission pursued for the good of mankind. He launched this campaign against many Wall Street practices, but mainly, he took aim at something called “naked short selling.”
With a short sale, traders borrow shares and then sell them, anticipating a drop in the price. If it does drop, they can buy back the shares and turn a profit. A naked short sale works much the same way — except that traders don’t actually borrow the shares. They sell shares they don’t have, and if this happens in sufficient numbers, it can flood the market with nonexistent shares — “phantom stock” — and actually drive prices down.
Basically, Byrne was complaining about a flaw in the stock settlement system, the system that controls the delivery of stock from one party to another. Three days after a trade, a seller must deliver the shares to the buyer. But with a naked short sale, this doesn’t happen. Shares are sold but not delivered. Some failures-to-deliver are a natural part of a rapid-fire trading system, but massive failures in a specific stock could indicate an abusive campaign to manipulate prices. “The stock settlement system was a mess,” Byrne says, quoting legendary investor Charlie Munger. “It was like having slop in a nuclear reactor.”

‘Someone who buys ink by the barrel shouldn’t get in a public fight with a man who buys bandwidth by the gigabyte’
— Patrick Byrne
Byrne’s stance was that hedge funds and banks were exploiting this hole, that regulators and legislators were turning a blind eye to it, and that reporters were ignoring the practice, too, if not actively supporting it.
Certainly, most of the press discussed naked shorting as some sort of myth created by Byrne and others. But even as his father, the onetime chairman of the Overstock board, came out against his son’s campaign, Byrne kept going, as only he could.
When BusinessWeek reporter Tim Mullaney sent him a list of questions — questions Byrne characterizes as the “are-you-still-beating-your-wife?” variety — the Overstock CEO promptly published both questions and answers on the web, effectively killing the magazine’s story. He planted someone inside a meeting of the Society of American Business Editors and Writers, recording what was said about him — that he needed to be stopped — and posting that online, too. He created a new company, staffed by his own journalists and web mavens, that would do nothing but fight his crusade, battling the traditional press through a website he called Deep Capture — a nod to Byrne’s claim that regulators had been “captured” by Wall Street, that there was a revolving door between the big banks and the top positions at the SEC.
“Mark Twain said: ‘Never get in a public fight with someone who buys his ink by the barrel,’” Byrne tells me. “I say: ‘Someone who buys ink by the barrel shouldn’t get in a public fight with a man who buys bandwidth by the gigabyte.’”
In 2006, when his efforts to expose Wall Street abuses were rebuffed by Senator Richard Shelby, then chairman of US Senate’s banking committee, Byrne went on national radio and called the Senator an “ignorant cracker.” He and his Deep Capture team spent years trying to prove that his biggest critic, former BusinessWeek reporter Gary Weiss, maintained control over the Wikipedia pages that painted such a negative portrait of Byrne and his crusade — and eventually, they succeeded, digging up emails implicating Weiss and forcing his removal from the site. Overstock itself went so far as to file a $3.48 billion lawsuit against Goldman Sachs, Merrill Lynch, and seven other prime Wall Street brokers, claiming they too were complicit in these naked shorting schemes.
And, then, in the fall of 2008, the market crashed. The fallout would cast Byrne’s crusade in whole new light.
Photo: Joe Pug/WIRED
Photo: Joe Pugliese/WIRED

The Radioactive CEO

Years later, when I spend a few days with Byrne at Overstock headquarters and sit down for dinner at his home, a jewel of a log cabin just outside the ski resort of Park City, Utah, he’s still railing against the ethics of market traders and the ineffectiveness of government regulators and even the influence of the East European mafia on Wall Street. Having steeped himself in philosophy at Stanford, focusing on economics and jurisprudence, he describes the world almost like a shaman — someone who sees things you at first don’t — and there’s a palpable restlessness about him. He sometimes has trouble sitting down for more than a few minutes.
He doesn’t talk like your average CEO, offhandedly sprinkling his conversation with allusions to everything from Star Wars and the Dilbert cartoons to the Austrian-British philosopher Karl Popper, and he doesn’t dress like one. One morning, he shows up in a coat with leather fringe that looks like something straight out an old Hollywood Western. Another day, he arrives in a collarless button-down and a blazer with no lapels, looking more like Dr. No or some other villain from the James Bond movies. Overstock executive vice chairman Jonathan Johnson says that when he first interviewed for a job at the company, Byrne was wearing a silk Chinese shirt with a dragon print and an African millipede was crawling up his arm.

‘Patrick Byrne was pilloried in the press, who made him look like a conspiracy-mongering lunatic. But sometimes, even conspiracy-mongering lunatics are right’
— James Angel
But it’s Byrne’s Wall Street stories that raise your eyebrows the most, the tales that play out more like pulp fiction than the life of a bargain retailer. His naked shorting crusade began with a phone call from an anonymous investor who still refuses to give Byrne — or me — his real name. In the wake of the Sith Lord call, Byrne says, Overstock was investigated five times by the SEC. And in early 2006, according to Byrne and two others who were there, a man carrying messages for a Russian crime syndicate threatened his life during a meeting on Long Island, insisting he abandon his Wall Street crusade.
It’s no surprise that the biggest publications all but stopped writing about him for a time. His story is so difficult for anyone to get their arms around. His way with metaphor can leave the literal minded scratching their heads. And perhaps more to the point, Byrne spent so many years attacking the press as few other public figures have.
His critics will tell you he wanted it this way, that his crusade was merely an effort to deflect attention from his struggling company. “The clever part about Patrick Byrne is that his attacks on the press really caused people to stop writing about him,” says Times columnist Nocera. “It just wasn’t worth it. You can write about sane people.”
But today, despite making such enemies on Wall Street, Overstock is a company that has been profitable for three out of the last four years — that one down year the result of its misguided attempts to rebrand itself as O.co. The company’s move to bitcoin has begun to push Byrne back into the public eye, this time in more positive ways. And though few press outlets have said as much, his Wall Street crusade looks prescient in the wake of the 2008 crash.
After Bear Sterns and Lehman Brothers went under and Merrill Lynch was gobbled up by Bank of America, the SEC issued orders designed to curb the very thing that Byrne had crusaded against. As those financial houses struggled to stay afloat, it seemed, they too had been hit by naked short sellers.
According to James Angel, a professor of finance at Georgetown University and a visiting professor at the Wharton School of Business who specializes in the nuts and bolts of the economic system, Byrne’s warnings about naked short selling were nothing less than the naked truth. “Patrick Byrne was pilloried in the press, who made him look like a conspiracy-mongering lunatic,” Angel says. “But sometimes, even conspiracy-mongering lunatics are right.”
Many agree with Angel, but others — including USC economics professor Lawrence Harris and journalists like Nocera — still say naked shorting was never the problem that Byrne said it was. All these years later, this is still a hot-button issue, in part because Overstock is still fighting its massive lawsuit against Goldman Sachs and Merrill Lynch, but also because Byrne is so reviled by so many. “I find it unbelievable that you think this is a complicated story with two sides,” Nocera tells me.
But, whatever side you come down on, the larger point is that Byrne is still fighting. Following the SEC’s new rules, naked short selling almost vanished. But the agency has since indicated that at least part of the problem still remains, and Byrne and others believe the practice has moved into other parts of the market, including what are called exchange traded funds. Once again, Byrne says, people are selling stuff they don’t really have.

The $100,000 Ad

His fight is no less pointed — and no less entertaining. This past summer, he spent $100,000 on a full-page ad in The Wall Street Journal, merely so he could mock the embattled hedge fund billionaire Steven Cohen.
The previous Thursday, a federal grand jury had indicated Cohen’s company, SAC Capital, charging the $14 billion hedge fund with four counts of securities fraud and one count of wire fraud for running what prosecutors call an unprecedented insider trading scheme. “Congratulations on the indictment, Stevie. And remember: roll early, roll often,” Byrne’s ad read, calling on Cohen to give up his co-conspirators. The ad even went so far as to claim that Cohen was the Sith Lord that Byrne warned of all those years ago.
It was typical Byrne. When I press him, he can’t quite support this claim, and certainly, the SAC indictment had nothing to do with naked shorting. But Byrne has spent years complaining about the practices of Cohen and SAC. In his own way, he’s trying to show that hedge funds and banks are exploiting many holes in the system. And behind the scenes, he continues to work in subtler ways to plug these holes.

‘People who come through those challenges, particularly when they’re young, have a very different view of the world’
— Robert Shapiro
Over the years, the Overstock CEO has cultivated a vast network of like-minded souls who believe in greater reform on Wall Street. He has a way of attracting Wall Street whistleblowers and then helping to push their stories into the public eye, via the courts and through reporters sympathetic to his cause. One of these whistleblowers is Mark Rosenblum, a former employee at Thomson Reuters who sued the news and business information firm, claiming he was fired for telling the FBI the firm was selling key economic data to certain traders before it was released to the rest of the market.
“I would not have had the courage or the necessary resources to come forward without Patrick,” Rosenblum says, explaining that Byrne has not only helped put him in touch with the right people but helped with his legal bills.
Byrne’s crusade is almost pathological, and some argue this is a product of his well-documented health problems. Over the years, he has gone under the knife 29 times, including eight surgeries for an irregular heartbeat, a residual effect of his cancer. His last surgery was in late January. “He’s trained in philosophy — which means he takes a larger view already — and he’s also struggled with his health,” says Robert Shapiro, a Harvard-trained macroeconomist who served as president Bill Clinton’s undersecretary of commerce and is now a consultant to companies that believe they’ve been victimized by abusive naked short selling, including Overstock. “People who come through those challenges, particularly when they’re young, have a very different view of the world. They are less concerned with the bullshit — and more concerned with larger things.”
Some believe his cancer has nothing to do with his attitudes — and that includes Byrne himself. But his concern and determination are very real. It’s evident yet again with Overstock’s move to bitcoin. To many, the bitcoin revolution is insanity, but after deciding the digital currency was the way forward, Byrne struck a deal with a bitcoin payment processor and pushed the digital currency onto his site in a matter of days. “I didn’t want someone else to beat us,” he says. Days after that, he moved millions from his personal fortune into the digital currency.

Beyond Bitcoin

Once again, Byrne is looking beyond the moment. He argues that bitcoin is an idea that can change more than money. He believes it can change Wall Street too, putting an end to the corruption he has spent so many years fighting. And others agree.
Bitcoin is a currency, like the dollar or the euro, and it’s a money transmitter, like a credit card network or PayPal. But at the most basic level, the worldwide software system that underpins bitcoin is really just a means of instantly verifying that you’ve sent something to someone else. “It allows for the decentralized proof and transfer of ownership,” says Fred Ehrsam, the co-founder of Coinbase, the outfit that handles bitcoin transactions on behalf of Overstock.

‘You would have an instant, frictionless market, while having the added benefit of wiping out a whole parasitic class of society — that is, the whole financial industry’
— Patrick Byrne
Because its ledger of funds is completely public, users always know how much money there is and where it is. That’s one of the reasons Byrne is so attracted to it. He knows that, as with gold, the supply is limited. Governments and banks can’t make more of it. But as Ehrsam points out, the bitcoin framework could also be used for things other than money — like stocks.
“It so happens that the first application of this is payments and money, but it doesn’t have to be,” Ehrsam says. “It could transfer a securities, too.” In other words, it would be feasible to build a bitcoin for the stock market, a system that would quickly, easily, and reliably move securities, a system that would make it clear who owns what at any given time, a system, in other words, that could completely eliminate naked short selling and other schemes like it.
When I toss that idea at Byrne, he tells me that he’s already thought of it, that it could prevent an entire ecosystem of funds and banks from gaming the market. “It’s like you’re reading my mind,” he says. “You would have an instant, frictionless market, while having the added benefit of wiping out a whole parasitic class of society — that is, the whole financial industry.”
It’s an outrageous and ridiculously ambitious idea. But it also makes perfect sense, and it just might happen. The bitcoin software is open source, meaning anyone can make a copy and modify it as they see fit. That includes Patrick Byrne.
Yes, some of the world’s brightest financial minds question whether bitcoin even has a future as a digital currency. That includes no less a name than New York Times columnist and Nobel Prize winning economist Paul Krugman, who says it’s not a reliable store of money, much less a viable way of moving it from place to place. But that doesn’t phase Byrne. He’s been there so many times before, and he typically responds in the same way. “Paul Krugman was great,” Byrne says, “until he went crazy.”
http://www.wired.com/business/2014/02/rise-fall-rise-patrick-byrne/?cid=18332654

Monday, January 27, 2014

DOJ Finally Going After The Criminal Materminds With Arrest Of 24 Year-Old Bitcoin Exchange Founder

Tyler Durden's picture

 
The US crackdown on Bitcoin has been long in coming, with ebbs and flows of enforcement as regulators have been unsure exactly how to proceed with dismantling the digital fiat alternative. This morning the ebb became a rising tide, after U.S. prosecutors announced charges against two men operating Bitcoin exchange businesses for attempting to sell $1 million worth of Bitcoin to users of the underground black market website Silk Road, which was shut down by authorities in September.
Reuters reports that the U.S. Attorney's office in Manhattan said in a statement that authorities arrested Charlie Schrem, chief executive officer of the exchange BitInstant.com, on Sunday and Robert Faiella, who ran an underground Bitcoin exchange called BTCKing, on Monday. The two were charged with conspiring to commit money laundering and operating an unlicensed money transmitting business. Schrem is also vice president of the main Bitcoin-focused trade group, the Bitcoin Foundation, according to the foundation's website and Schrem's LinkedIn profile.
Some details from the charge against the defendants:
Federal prosecutors charged Faiella, 52, and Shrem, 24, with engaging in a scheme to sell more than $1 million of Bitcoins to users of Silk Road. Each defendant was charged with conspiring to commit money laundering, which carries a maximum prison sentence of 20 years. They are additionally charged with operating an unlicensed money transmitting business, which has a max sentence of five years in prison.

The U.S. also charged Shrem with violating the Bank Secrecy Act by “willfully failing” to file suspicious activity reports on Faiella’s questionable transactions. This charge carries a maximum sentence of five years in prison.

In addition to the Manhattan U.S. Attorney, the charges were announced by the Drug Enforcement Agency and the criminal investigation division of the Internal Revenue Service.

“Hiding behind their computers, both defendants are charged with knowingly contributing to and facilitating anonymous drug sales, earning substantial profits along the way,” said DEA acting special-agent-in-charge James Hunt.

Schrem was apprehended by authorities at JFK International Airport in New York on Sunday and is set to appear in federal court in Manhattan later on Monday. Faiella was arrested at his Cape Coral, Fla., home on Monday and is expected to appear in federal court in the Middle District of Florida.

The court documents allege Faiella operated an underground Bitcoin exchange on the Silk Road website between December 2011 and October 2013 that sold the crypto currency to users who wanted to buy illegal drugs on the site. After receiving orders, he filled them through a New York company designed to enable customers to exchange cash for Bitcoins anonymously, the U.S. alleges.

Shrem served as the New York Bitcoin company’s CEO during much of that timeframe and was “fully aware that Silk Road was a drug-trafficking website” and that Faiella was operating an exchange service for Silk Road users, the documents say.

Prosecutors say Shrem still did business with Faiella to maintain a “lucrative source” of revenue. He personally processed Faiella’s orders, gave him discounts on high-volume transactions, failed to file a single suspicious activity report and even helped Faiella “circumvent” the company’s anti-money laundering policies, the documents allege.

Bharara said the investigation remains ongoing.
As a reminder, BitInstant, which at the time "aimed to be the go-to site" to buy and sell bitcoins, received a $1.5 million investment by Winklevoss Capital in May 2013. From the TechCrunch profile of the startup:
BitInstant, which has a full-time staff of 16 led by CEO Charlie Shrem, has emerged as a key player in the nascent Bitcoin market: The company already processes approximately 30 percent of the money going into and out of Bitcoin, and last month alone facilitated 30,000 transactions, the Winklevosses said in a phone call this week. The funding is meant to allow the company to further scale up its staff and product as it angles to become the go-to site for Bitcoin transfers.
The US charge is not a ringing endorsement for the premise behind the Winklevi investment:
The Winklevosses say they were attracted to invest in BitInstant in large part because of its leadership. CEO Shrem is the vice chairman of the Bitcoin Foundation, and CIO Alex Waters previously worked with the core developers on the original Satoshi Bitcoin client. “Charlie has been in the space for a very long time, and he has an impeccable reputation among Bitcoiners. He knows everyone in the space and everyone in the space knows him,” Cameron Winklevoss said. “One of the most exciting things about people who are into Bitcoin is that they’re a really passionate community, and Charlie is a passionate entrepreneur. He would be in that category of someone who lives, breathes, and sleeps Bitcoin.”
Perhaps. However, in retrospect Charlie's biggest crime was not being CEO of JPM or, at worst, HSBC, where money laundering and other criminal activity is not only encouraged but rewarded with soaring bonuses. The good news is that one can once and for all confirm that when it comes to "Justice" in the US, some - those who deal with legacy status quo mandated and enforced ponzi scheme fiat - are far more equal than anyone who dares to think outside the Fed's printer.
Finally, here is a recent profile of 24 year old "criminal mastermind" Schrem via Bitcoin Examiner.

Meet Charlie Shrem. He’s 23 years old and the co-owner of Evr, one of the most famous gastro pubs in Manhatan. The name might sound familiar, since we talked about this pub before, when it became one of the first establishments to receive Bitcoin as a payment for drinks and food in New York City.
But why is Charlie Shrem different from other crypto-millionaires? Because he is now a BitAngel, member of an investment group created to invest in Bitcoin startups. We’ve also talked about this group before here.
Today, whenever someone pays at Evr with digital coin, Shrem gets a little bit richer, but he’s using his money to help others. Everything started in 2011, when Bitcoin became more famous, he bought thousands of Bitcoins for about $20 each. He invested almost everything he had in what could have been a dangerous game. However, since then, the digital coin value has skyrocketed.
130408074003-evr-bitcoin-bar-620xa
At Evr, with his business partner.
After his investment in the bar, he founded the exchange platform Bitinstant. “Infrastructure is what we need. We’ve got to build, build, build–financial software, exchanges, and different payment products”, says Charlie Shrem, who clearly followed his own advice and profited with it.
He might not have the same funds as big Silicon Valley investors, but he has turned into a Bitcoin angel anyway. “The early guys are the ones that run everything. In this space, how long you’ve been around matters”, explains the entrepreneur.
However, we would like to look at him and others and see some kind of Bitcoin ambassadors, the ones that are setting the example and showing how it’s possible to grow once you leave your fear behind and go deep into a new world like cryptocurrency. Because they show what Bitcoin is for real: an opportunity.

* * *
And now, please join us in a moment of solemn silence as we fondly recall the memory of all the HSBC bankers who were thrown in prison for aiding, abetting and profiting from laundering money with known global terrorists...

Friday, January 10, 2014

In First Day With Bitcoin, Overstock Does $126,000 in Sales

  • BY CADE METZ

Wednesday, December 18, 2013

Who Owns the World’s Biggest Bitcoin Wallet? The FBI

  • By Robert McMillan

Sunday, December 1, 2013

Bitcoin Plunges Into Bear Market

Tyler Durden's picture